h1. Dave Winer posts in early January 2016 My current "bookmarks page":http://jothut.com/cgi-bin/junco.pl/blogpost/63996/Bookmarks-Lite-2 of sites that I visit or feeds that I consume includes a link to DW's feed near the top of the list. I access his feed multiple times per day to see what new insights he has posted. I'm mainly interested in his thoughts and projects regarding web publishing. I agree and disagree with his tech posts. I don't care about the other topics. I don't access his Facebook or Twitter pages, except in extremely rare occasions. I read the RSS feed from his blog. Here is how I read Dave Winer's writings: "feed page.":http://jothut.com/cgi-bin/junco.pl/blogpost/863/Dave-Winer-Scriptingcom I use my custom "feed" command that is included within my Junco code that powers this site. The feed command also exists in the Parula code that powers my message board at ToledoTalk.com. Here's how it works. The feed= is surrounded by two curly braces at each end. The line must begin at the start of a new line in order for it to work. {{feed=http://scripting.com/rss.xml desc}} I'd like to excerpt from and comment about three DW posts that he made over the past couple days. * Jan 4, 2016 - "Leave nothing but footprints":http://scripting.com/liveblog/users/davewiner/2016/01/04/0790.html * Jan 4, 2016 - "Why tech insiders must be on Facebook":http://scripting.com/liveblog/users/davewiner/2016/01/04/0787.html * Jan 5, 2016 - "Re Twitter easing the 140-char limit":http://scripting.com/liveblog/users/davewiner/2016/01/05/0796.html Dave claims that he likes the open web, and he often rails against silos, such as Twitter and Facebook. In the summer of 2013, I discovered the #indieweb group via a poster mentioning the https://indiewebcamp.com in a comment to one of DW's posts. Maybe the word "silo" has been used for a long time to describe social media sites, but the term got popularized in my conscience by the Indieweb site. I added #webmention support to my Junco code because of the Indieweb group. The Indieweb people "use" social media sites differently. They own their own domain names. They post articles and notes to their own blog sites. But rather than manually cross-posting their info their many social media presences, they use software that makes it appear that the Indieweb users are using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. just like everyone else, but that's not the true. Indieweb users may never log into their social media sites, but their content gets posted to those sites, and the comments, likes, shares, etc. at those other sites come back to their personal sites. It's interesting. Since I don't "use" Twitter and Facebook, having my info posted automatically at those other sites is unnecessary. I use Instagram but mainly as a notetaking app and a place to store photos. But lately, I rely more on Flickr. Again. I've been using Flickr for many years. I don't use Flickr to network with others. I use it to store photos that I then embed into my own web publishing apps and sites. This past summer, I created my Waxwing app to be a simple image uploader that speeds up the process of using images within my web publishing apps. But I still use Flickr too. I'm not interested in networking with people beyond my own message board ToledoTalk.com that I started in January 2003. I could be considered anti-social because I don't use the hot social media/social networking sites, and that's okay by me. I'm fine with being labeled and called names. I won't get offended. I like message boards, wikis, and blogs. If that's old school or archaic, then that's okay too because I subscribe to the theory that every human being is unique. Why would zealot fans of social media sites assume that everyone should enjoy using those sites/apps? And why do these zealot fans get irritated that some people have the nerve not to use those sites? I don't care if these social media sites exist. More amateur content gets created. That's a good thing. They all have pros and cons. But I'm simply not interested in them. And I'm not alone with this thinking. I'm no