# tt post mar 24 2016

Regarding JoeyGee's link: http://m.toledoblade.com/local/2016/03/24/Toledo-s-landfill-is-reaching-capacity-unless-the-city-acts.html 

Holy hell. This is what we mean by Detroitification.

I refuse to believe the city's claim. It's a lie, in my opinion. A huge, fear-mongering-based lie.

People, one reason for the city implementing the illegal refuse fee tax last decade was because the city claimed that we needed to extend the lifespan of our landfill.

The city promised that the refuse fee would drop to zero for  people who recycled.  This was to encourage more recycling, which would extend the lifespan of the landfill.

All lies. More people recycled, which allegedly was a good thing. But the city did not give recyclers a discount because the city needed the money. 

The refuse fee sold as something altruistic, but it was always revenue stream for the city to use however it wanted.

Lies.

Blade stories:

* "March 2007":http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2007/03/31/Toledo-City-Council-plans-5-50-a-month-trash-fee.html when the refuse fee was first implemented:

q.
The fee is aimed at subsidizing the $16 million annual expense of unlimited weekly trash pickup and dumping in the city-owned landfill in North Toledo.
q..

Yeah right. We already paid taxes to support those functions.

* "February 2008":City trash fee may jump to $10 a month or drop to $0

q.
A Toledo councilman wants to charge residents who don't recycle a $10 monthly trash fee. The cost for those who do recycle at the curb? *Nothing.*

Councilman D. Michael Collins, author of the proposed ordinance, said the incentive will *increase recycling and thereby extend the life of the city's landfill on Hoffman Road.*

"If 60 percent of the households recycle, that equates to 18,000 tons of solid waste a year," Mr. Collins said.

*The landfill has an expected remaining life of about 27 years.* Building a new landfill would cost about $80 million.
q..

That was 2008. 27 years. That equals 2035.

From today's March 2016 "story,":http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2016/03/24/Toledo-s-landfill-is-reaching-capacity-unless-the-city-acts.html the city claims that the landfill has a lifespan of 6.7 years. That's about 2023. 

Despite the dramatic increase in recycling over the past nine years, our landfill lost about 12 years of life. 

Oh, and of course the city needs more money. *Interesting timing on all of this.* That's why I don't believe the city.  More from today's Blade story:

q.
The city needs $3.3 million to add another cell that would provide 4.6 additional years worth of space at the current fill rate.

After that, a new section that would last 35 years — and cost taxpayers $29.6 million — would need to be created.

There is currently no plan to pay for this expense, officials acknowledged.

David Welch, commissioner of the streets, bridges, and harbor division, said the city has a solid waste trust fund, which is supposed to be the account for money identified for landfill expansion.

City spokesman Janet Schroeder said the *fund has only $59,611* — less than 2 percent of what’s needed for the cell expansion.

*Council President Steven Steel said he ++thought++ the fund had “a few hundred thousand dollars.”*
q..

Thought? Money might be missing?

If the Blade had the resources, that looks like an investigation.

Regarding the city's latest claim about the landfill's lifespan, maybe the city is telling the truth this time, for the first time, but how or why would anyone believe the city's claims? 

I would need the Toledo media combined with multiple outside auditors who are not on the take to investigate Toledo's landfill issue to prove that the lifespan only has a few more years. Otherwise, it's all a lie, in my opinion.

More from today's Blade story:

q.
A percentage of money the city charges for private companies to dump trash at the landfill is directed to the fund. Also, money the city used to receive for recyclables was deposited into that account, *but the city now pays to have recyclables processed.*
q..

And about the 2016 re