Art content silos winning?

http://scripting.com/2014/10/04/#a1412451482

Winning at what, exactly? And why do some hardcore geeks worry about whether silos are winning, losing, or whatever? The masses don't care. The masses only want something fun and easy to use. They want to relish in the moment.

I'm guessing that most people are not text content hoarders. People may want to keep their photos indefinitely somewhere, but how many people back up their photos to a DvD disk or some other storage device?

I think users are satisfied with posting their photos and videos to more than one service: Flickr, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Google, etc.

I used Flickr for years, but I like the Instragram app on the iPhone better, so now I use mainly Instagram. My photos may be scattered across different hosting services, but I back them up at home to DvD disks, so if the service shuts down, at least I still have the photos.

I think that most of these people share for the moment, and don't worry much about dredging up old posts in the future. It might be interesting to view their Facebook photos 20 years from now, assuming that's possible. I can still view old photo albums from more than 20 years ago.

Regarding text, how many users of social networking sites want the ability to view their text posts from 5 to 10 years ago? Bloggers enjoy having access to their old posts, but I don't think this is the norm. It's possible many users don't care if their old text posts become inaccessible in the future. They are not text content hoarders.

We hold verbal discussions in person with friends and family, and this content is not preserved, unless someone records the discussions. Generally, a sit-down meal and discussion is not preserved.

We have a history of ephemeral content. That's probably why Snapchat caught in with many. We hold an impromptu conversation or heated debate with someone in the hallway for a few minutes, and then that's it. The only archive is what can be recalled from memory.

Some of us like journaling or logging both the exciting and mundane events. It's amazing how much we forget. We think that we remember more than we do.

Recently, I've looked through some of my old blog postings from 2001 and 2002. In those old blog postings, I recorded some events that I had forgotten about. I'm glad that I had logged that information and saved it.

I've also journaled in notebooks for many years, but that ground to a halt in the fall of 2013 because I used JotHut more for more daily notetaking and mundane-journaling. Content hoarding.

But I have a lot of text in notebooks going back to 1999 that I need to somehow get into digital format, probably by photographing the notebook pages.

I wish that I had started journaling well before 1999. I have some journal notes from the 1980s, which makes for interesting reading.

But I'm guessing that bloggers and people who like to journal are the exception. The norm don't care about recording daily aspects of their lives for retrieval many years in the future.

I think that the social networking silos of today understand that most users are only interested in the present. Users are interested in simple functions like "liking" and "sharing" content because those are easy content "contributions" to make. And users are interested mainly in making very short text posts and uploading photos about their lives.

The masses journal by taking photos with their smartphones. That's why I like Instagram so much. In olden days of a few years ago, I would have recorded a note by using a ballpoint pen and a Moleskine or some other notebook. But now I can take easily snap a photo with my iPhone and upload it to Instagram and move on. This could weaken observation skills though.

That's why I like sketching with pencil, pen, and watercolor paints. It's and old thing to do. It forces me to slow down and be observant. I could snap and upload dozens of photos in the time that it takes me to make a simple watercolor sketch. But the painted sketch on paper may mean more to me.

But it's obvious that sketching the world with pen and paper is something done by a fraction of the population.

The social networking silos are exploiting the hardware devices of nifty smartphones and tablets. It's easy to produce and share content on the web. The masses want to use easy and fun things.

Hardcore geeks may like plowing through a series of complicated steps to produce and share content in the open web, and this process may seem trivial to the geeks, but it's a technical nightmare to the masses. And the masses won't take the time to learn. If it cannot be mastered with two or three clicks, then it's too complex. The silos make it easy for the masses.

The silo concept simply appeals to most people who have other things to do with their time than worry about the open web. That's a shame, but that's reality, in my opinion.

My wife and I use the web in two dramatic ways. We're not even close with how we produce and share content on the web. I'm in the minority. My wife's web usage is more commonplace.

I've never had a silo vs open web conversation with my wife because I know it will not interest her. Discussing home beer brewing is more interesting to my wife.

My wife won't be interested in setting up a server and downloading a decentralized networking app.

The open web group will be a niche group or "market." It will be big enough to merit monitoring and conversation, but it won't be mainstream.

I guess that means the silos are winning, but the silos don't own the entire web yet. It's a pretty big web and deep web. The open web crowd should continue mushing forward, building tools and evangelizing their benefits. Slowly, more converts will join the crusade. It won't be enough to drastically alter the silo landscape, but small victories or compromises may occur, and that's a reason to continue with the open web or Indieweb concepts.

The masses, they are not even thinking about silos and the open web, so who's winning does not register.

For the geeks, some will surrender and assume that the currently hot silo is the winner, but this will change over time. AOL, Xanga, MySpace, LiveJournal, and others are not as big today as they once were. New networks or technologies will emerge in the future that could drastically change the social networking landscape.

The hardcore geeks are fairly loyal or stubborn, but the masses are fickle, and they will jump to what their friends are using, as long as the new service is still super easy and fun to use.

To me, this jumping around from one social networking service to another is proof that the masses don't care about preserving their old content, especially text content. I think they view their text content as temporary, so they have no qualms about moving to another social network and leaving their old content behind. I doubt they lose sleep over losing their old text content.