1 min

Tt post sep 18 2015

"WLS board is keeping this hushed up citing lawyer client privilege. I don't know how they can get away with not telling what he was actually reprimanded for."

They may not be able to get away with it.

The Blade has filed a public records request for that investigation, and is awaiting a formal response from the district.

"Go. Away."

Why should reggie go away? Ignore the thread if you are uncomfortable.

I don't live in the district, but this shit is on this site, and the story has become fascinating.

Which reality is true?

Also, it's a logical question. If the allegations were considered serious, but then the allegations were seemingly not true, then why the reprimand with all the language?

How is this not a possibility?

"The board was set to fire him but the boards lawyer reminded them that they would have to buy out his contract, so it was on to plan B, the letter."

(You mean the deranged Facebook mob didn't save his ass?)

From yesterday's Blade story

If he fails to follow the directives in the letter, he could face further discipline, which includes the potential nonrenewal of his contract in 2018, or termination.

The money angle makes sense from an Excel standpoint.

Anyway, I hope that the Blade digs in. Better tell the Blade to go away. Good luck with that. They have lawyers too.

From JR's : articles
232 words - 1329 chars - 1 min read
created on - #
source - versions



A     A     A     A     A

© 2013-2017 JotHut - Online notebook

current date: May 20, 2024 - 10:59 a.m. EDT