You're viewing old version number 2. - Current version
# Media and Politics in 2015-2017
Did the Russians rig the democrat primary process? Nope. The national democrat party did that. The democrat machine (DNC) choose Hillary years ago.
What about making every vote count? What about ending voter disenfranchisement? No shock that those are false ideals.
Did the Russians work with Bernie Sanders to help Bernie win the Wisconsin and Michigan primaries? Nope. Voters disliked Hillary. Simple.
How were those primary losses not huge red flag warnings to the Hillary campaign?
Did the Russians prevent Hillary from campaigning in Wisconsin in the fall of 2016?
Michael Moore predicted that Trump would beat Hillary because of what Moore observed within his home state of Michigan.
The Sanders campaign tried to warn and help the Hillary campaign about what was happening at the local level, but the Hillary people ignored the warnings.
In January 2017, an NPR story featured an interview with a local democrat operative from the Youngstown area. This operative tried to warn the Hillary people about the surprising political changes that he observed in Mahoning County, but the Hillary campaign ignored him.
How may local democrat operatives were ignored by the Hillary campaign/DNC?
Hillary/DNC executed a militantly arrogant campaign. They had no interest in the concerns of rust belt democrats. They deserved to lose.
Politicians lose elections because they are losers. But loser politicians don't think that way. They believe that they lost because of other factors.
Nope. It's not the fault of Ross Perot, Ralph Nader, Jill Stein, Gary Johnson, non-voters, nor the Russians.
100 percent of the blame goes to the losing politician, and in 2016 the blame also goes to the national democrat party for executing a sham primary process.
The national political media CHOOSES which stories to make popular. I don't understand how the rigged democrat primary process is not viewed as violence toward democracy. That's a bigger story than senseless narratives, like the Russians' alleged influence in the 2016 November election and the Facebook fake news.
Fake news, propaganda, and yellow journalism has existed for decades. I admire the creativity of internet geeks to make money by preying on the ignorance of others.
And while fake news was mentioned prior to the November 2016 election, the mainstream media teamed together to turn the issue into an extinction level event after Trump won.
Do you think that the media would have harped on Facebook's alleged fake news problem if Hillary had won?
In my opinion, if the national political media was concerned about freedom and democracy, then they would be investigating what happened with the 2015-2016 democrat primary process? Who was involved? When did the scheme get hatched? What prevents it from occurring again for either party?
From JR's : articles
447 words - 2815 chars
- 2 min read
created on
updated on
- #
source
- versions