Dave Winer - Scripting.com
Scripting News - 2018-01-19T17:04:59Z
Other cutters - 2018-01-19T17:04:59Z
I was just talking with a friend, two ideas --
- skicutter -- like Wirecutter but for ski areas. Where's the best skiing right now.
- weedcutter -- same thing for weed.
For extra credit, cross-tabulate. 💥
There was an outage on scripting.com earlier today. I let a domain expire, thinking it wasn't in use. Haha. Okay. I renewed it. It seems to be resolving here, so the outage should be over. Sorry. I'll be more careful in the future. 🚀
Journalists still think they were/are bloggers. Reporters using blogging tools is not blogging. Bloggers are reporters' sources. They say blogging is over because their professional CMSes caught up? They're in a bubble. A profession that should be good at listening only actually listens to itself.
Much of what I read in #metoo writing paints men solely as women haters. That's all there is to say about us. Your father, brother, son, uncle, cousin, friends, we only exist to hate women. That of course is not true. I think what we all want, men and women, is to relax, to be loved, to feel safe, pleasure, acceptance, and secure for the moment. That's imho most of what we're looking for in love. No specific gender.
Update on the Feeds for Journalists project. "The current list doesn't have much meta-news or news-about-news. It's mostly just plain news. I am totally in favor of adding Canadian feeds, but for news orgs that are producing news about Canada, and news from a Canadian perspective."
I support the NYT turning over its editorial page to Trump voters. But we keep hearing from them. How about Clinton voters next. And black voters. And people who didn't vote. And so on. Let's hear more from people outside the elite bubble.
Where you see Americans trashing each other online, use your imagination. How are trolls, some Russian, some from elsewhere, instigating to make it worse, increase the hurt, damage, deepen the division, make it more permanent?
Little wrecked ecosystems - 2018-01-18T15:25:57Z
With Google Reader shutting down and Facebook pulling out of news, and now HuffPost withdrawing, I feel great. Vindicated. Optimistic once again.
There is no magic to platforms. Corporate platforms always end up as puddles. Little wrecked ecosystems that started with great bluster.
The only platforms worth developing for are ones without a platform vendor. That is, open platforms based on open formats and protocols.
I was asked why Google Reader is on my list.
- They didn't support all of RSS, so blogging became limited to what Google Reader understood. And then they just threw it all out, like a massive oil spill, and did nothing to clean it up. In the end it would have been better if it never existed.
Goodbye Huffington Post - 2018-01-18T14:50:04Z
I tried writing at Huffington Post, many years ago, hoping to get more flow. When I finally got a hot story on HP, here's what they did.
- Rewrote it.
- Redirected traffic from my page to theirs.
That's when the great experiment ended. 💥
The Feeds for Journalists OPML file is now available. You can use this file to subsribe to all the feeds in any feed reader. It will be updated periodically, so check back. Even better if your reader allows you to subscribe to OPML files, a drum I've been beating for a long time. Then you'll get the updates automatically.
If you're a journalist and have ideas for a feed or two or want to see the discussion so far, here's the place to look.
New this.how doc on Black Lives Matter.
Back when blogging was young, I was the chief blogger in some sense. I got a lot of shit. I was surprised then, not now. The picture people painted wasn't me. Reading their stories, I sounded like the little capitalist dude in the Monopoly game.
How Trump stank up Haiti - 2018-01-17T15:44:39Z
I read this Politico piece about this history of Trump and Haiti.
Initially there was some bad data about a possible connection betw Haitians and AIDS that soon turned out to be false. But Trump kept bringing it up, and the stink on Haiti wouldn't go away.
Trump is still putting the stink on Haiti.
Reading this reminds me of the stink that people in tech put on RSS. There never was anything wrong with RSS, no data behind any of the things that were said, but people, some who even thought we were friends, said some very ugly Trump-like things about RSS. (Actually even worse.)
That's the sad thing about Trump, not just that he is such a flawed awful human being who is our president, but that if you live long enough, you've met plenty of other people who take exactly those kinds of shortcuts just to hurt other people.
Just realized, the reason librarians must love the web, and linking, is that you can provide a complete bit of complex information without being overwhelming. It's the same reason I like coding in an outliner. There's no cost for being verbose, just tuck the verbosity under a headline and leave it collapsed. Until the day you wonder wtf is going on here. You can hide little crumb trails for later discovery. Links work the same way.
Last week it was a real struggle to find the RSS feed for the Slow Burn podcast, but we did find it, and a new episode just showed up on podcatch.com , so the loop closes. Happy. 💥
River5 michegas continued - 2018-01-16T18:04:15Z
The thread continues.
I believe I have found the least disruptive way to fix the file-read synchronization problem.
Here's a gist containing a new local routine that reads an XML feed.
Note that we save processing of new items for the end, and don't do any processing until the feed river is in the cache.
Update: I have the changes implemented locally, testing.
What open source means to me - 2018-01-16T15:54:52Z
In putting together the Feeds for Journalists project, I had to figure out some new stuff about open source, because I had never seen the idea applied previously to a list of feeds. I haven't even seen it used for docs, novels or news, written work, but I'm sure it has been.
So when I publish something via open source, what does that mean?
- I work alone. The projects I publish are my code. I am responsible for every aspect of it. I try not to hack stuff in. And people who don't work on the code regularly can only hack stuff in (unless their brains are empty or they're some kind of prodigy, I've heard they exist, but have never met one). So I don't accept pull requests. I prefer clearly written feature requests.
- I know my code has quirks. I use an outliner to write it, for one thing. You're seeing the generated code. That's another reason why pull requests don't work. And because I use an outliner, I edit structures of code, and nesting doesn't have any impact on readability or maintainability. But everyone's code is quirky. Reading other people's code is like opening their refrigerator. ;-)
- When I find problems in other people's packages, and I do, I write up bug reports exactly as if I didn't have access to the source code. I try to stay within the three part framework -- 1. What I was doing. 2. What I expected to happen. 3. What actually happened. I have found it off-putting when the project owner asks me instead to submit a pull request. I don't have the bandwidth to learn how your codebase works internally.
For the Feeds for Journalists project, I own the list. You are encouraged to make feature requests, in the form of URLs of feeds you think should be on the list, or to question the inclusion of any feed I've put there. I'm totally open to discussion (with the usual caveat as long as it's respectful).
But first, before proposing an idea, think about what the project is trying to create -- a collection of feeds that's likely to cover breaking news from a number of angles with forays into science, the arts, education, humor. I included a feed about torrents (because it's good, and they have many of the same values as journalists and I think it would be useful for you all to get to know each other).
1. Suggest feeds and 2. Tell me why you suggested it. Ultimately I'm going to decide if it goes in this collection. And because there's a liberal open source license, if you see another direction to take it, for a subset of journalists perhaps, or librarians, or Italian journalists, you can fork it and use it as the basis for your own list.
PS: I think this piece will become a this.how doc, like the one about standards, which also began as a blog post.
The "glory days" of news readers are as irrelevant as the print edition of the NY Times. News readers were never that good. Twitter and Facebook are better as news readers. New news flows demand new approaches.
And RSS is here to help.
Yet more River5 michegas - 2018-01-15T23:45:34Z
BTW, the River5 discussion continues with Carsten.
He points out that the new method I proposed for adding items to rivers not only is more complex than the current method, and therefore more difficult to maintain, something I totally concur with, it still has a synchronization problem. Copying a pointer and deleting an object can't be an atomic operation. it's still possible something will be added to a queue betw the two steps. And that would result in a lost item.
We're now somewhat in the weeds, possibly, but we all agree it's better to have an approach that loses zero items, than one that maybe loses one item on (possibly) rare occasions. So I have proposed yet another approach in a comment. This one has the advantage of retaining the current simplicity and hding a bell/whistle that didn't need to be there in the first place.
Journalists, let's help journalism thrive on the net - 2018-01-15T15:31:59Z
If you're a journalist and you love RSS, please join me in an easy project to improve both. Let's put together a list of starter feeds for journalists.
In order for this to work it has to be done primarily by journalists. I'm happy to help any way I can.
I started this project because I am sure that unless news thrives on the net we are totally screwed. I've never felt that we could trust Facebook to be the official distribution system for journalism on the net.
This is the first step to creating many distribution nets, so a competitive market can develop. I've bootstrapped successful tech projects before. This is how it begins! It's not that hard, it just requires cooperation and a clear goal.
Facebook is not thriving, for me - 2018-01-15T15:48:05Z
I'm guessing what Facebook saw in numbers is what I feel as a user. It's drying up.
The most interesting part of Facebook is the On This a Day In feature, and even that is starting to scare me as we relive 2016 and 2017.
It's very quiet on Facebook these days. And to the extent it's not quiet it's profoundly depressing.
I don't feel it's too hyper to say Facebook is dying.
Not sure there was anything they could have done to prevent it, but a dramatic U-turn away from news says, to me, they see it too now.
Can you imagine what would have happened if the Hawaii message had happened in NYC or DC. The panic would have been unreal. People would have died. And the odds of a retaliatory strike would have been there too. This is how wars start, btw.
Open source feeds for journalists - 2018-01-14T17:28:04Z
This got me thinking. What if a community created such a list of feeds, and did it over a period of weeks or months, with discussion, and a certain amount of deliberation.
We could use the tools of open source to do this project.
So, I've set up a new GitHub repository where we can work on that list of feeds. I'll write a small piece of software that periodically turns that collection into an OPML file suitable for use in a feed reader. From there who knows what happens, but just getting a list of feeds for journalists to follow, collaboratively, while it doesn't involve much work or technical know-how, would be a major improvement over the way we all do this individually, for ourselves.
I'll post updates on this project to this blog.
Re the River5 file-reading problem - 2018-01-14T15:52:44Z
Following up on yesterday's report on River5's file reading problem at startup, with futher thought I realized I did not have a solution to the problem.
The way I proposed doing it yesterday would have resulted in just as many lost items at startup. The problem was that the central routine was sending the JSON text of the file to each of the callbacks. Each would then parse the text, producing a structure which it would then link into the cache. Only one of the structures would survive in the cache, the last one linked in, and it would have one of the new items. The other new items would be lost. In other words, no improvement.
So I changed the code and had the central routine parse the text, and call each of the callbacks with the resulting structure. Now all the callbacks add their items to the same struct, (unless I'm still missing something) and the result is zero lost items.
I've created a gist with the new code, and left the old gist in place. I have not yet released a version of River5 that uses this new approach. Testing it here first then thinking about how I want to deploy.
Note this version is more complex because it has to initialize the struct once and only once, so the central routne, readRiverFile, must receive a callback that initializes the structure when the read fails, which it will do when the river file is first created.
I haven't received any comments, but they are still welcome.
When I was a kid, at the height of the cold war, I had dreams of looking out my window and seeing dozens of mushroom clouds off in the distance.
The other night Julia Ioffe said something wise on one of the shows: Almost everyone who immigrates comes from a shithole. Immigrating is no fun. It has to be worth it. People from Norway don't want to leave because it's not a shithole.
Theory: If two reporters use RSS systematically to gather news, and they combine lists, each reporter gets more value than they would on their own. If interests are aligned, but not too aligned, there's potential value beyond that.
Maybe the thing to do is to start a group of journalists who love and understand RSS and want to use it in new ways to make their journalism better.
Wondering.. - 2018-01-13T20:23:57Z
I wonder sometimes what goes thru people's minds when you offer to help and it's something you're expert in, and they ignore you.
It's been happening with news people constantly since I stared working on news software and formats on the web.
I can't imagine what ulterior motive they think I have. I don't make any money from the work. I do it because I am sure that unless news thrives on the net we are totally screwed.
Don't they see that too?
River5 file-reading problem - 2018-01-13T18:34:33Z
The first part of solving it was writing down concisely what the problem was. Carsten Senger did a great job, but he isn't responsible for the fix, I am. And I wrote the code and am familiar with how it's organized and how it got to be how it is.
The problem statement
- There are two kinds of rivers, ones associated with a list, and ones associated with a feed. The problem applies to both kinds of rivers, but is more likely to show up in the feed-based ones.
- When a new item comes in, it is added to the rivers of all the lists it's in, and in the river for the feed it came from. The river files are stored in files on disk. We cache them in memory. When we want to add an item to a river, we first check if it's in memory. If is, we add the item and we're done. If it's not in memory, we read it from disk, and then add the item to the river. This is where we run into trouble.
- The trouble is that there might be two or more new items from one feed for one river. The first item gets added okay. But when we try to add the second item, since reading the file takes so long, we will find it's not in the cache, so we start a second read. We add our item, but the first item probably isn't in the copy we loaded. It would be an amazing coincidence if it was. So no matter what, we just lost one of the new items from the river. If there are N new items in the first read, we will lose N-1 of them.
- The best solution is this -- create a queue for each river when the first read is initiated. Add its callback as the first and at that time only item in the queue. If a new read comes in while we're still reading the first one, add its callback to the queue. Once the file is read, call all the callbacks in the queue, concurrently, and delete the queue for that file.
- I put the queue code into a Gist for review. If you spot any problems, post a comment there. Thanks.
President Shithole goes for his physical.
XML-RPC started in 1998, which means it's about to be 20 years old. I think this is the first post about it. Not very specific. We were already working on it, but we hadn't yet hooked up with the people at Microsoft. From a quick scan it looks like the actual protocol we standardized on didn't come out publicly until June. Pretty sure we had something working internally at UserLand in March or April.
Ooops. We missed the 20th anniversary of RSS. The format that became RSS was rolled out in December 1997. Here's the piece where that was announced. I guess we missed the party. Open formats don't have PR firms. 💥
It's really weird, the date on the piece is wrong. It was December 27, not December 15. You can see that in the copy, it talks about being between Christmas and New Years. And mentions a piece that wasn't written until December 23. And I actually remember that this was on the 27th. Somehow, at some point, my CMS screwed this up. Which is weird because this is a static file. Looks like it was rebuilt some time in 2004. In any case if anyone wonders, the date is incorrect.
An unusually long podcast about Occam, Wolff, war, medicine, programming, debugging, hacking, Russia, war again, Pearl Harbor, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Watergate, Buzzfeed News, Ben Smith, the dossier, ladders, the elite, working together, and the day it hits us that this is not Watergate, will be another day like November 8, 2016. The gatekeepers, the elite, don't want to give up their positions on the ladder, so ideas that threaten that can't get through. Instead we have to be systematic about letting ideas in. There's a lot of tough love in here, but it's important.
I was out walking in the morning rush hour in Manhattan, everyone looks so nice. I wondered, since #metoo has the world been treating attractive women better? Has cat-calling diminished? Leery looks? Inappropriate comments?
Wolff is Occam's News - 2018-01-12T15:05:47Z
I've been pushing the idea of Occam's News, where we talk about what's obvious not what we can prove. Michael Wolff's approach is exactly that. It's not what you can prove, but it's what we know anyway. Both this and proof-based news are valid and needed.
Wars are fought with Occam's spy info, and guesswork about what the enemy is doing, and trying to figure out what's a decoy and what's real.
Also medicine. Sometimes they don't know what disease you have and they just start treating the one they think you might have and see if it works.
Programming, what I do, is most definitely not Occam-like, it's proof-based. But debugging is very much an Occam art.
MTP Daily is the worst cable show - 2018-01-12T14:05:54Z
I watched MTP Daily yesterday. For a few minutes, and then went back to work. It's an awful awful show. The worst of the worst.
I hate the show because Chuck Todd only talks about the horse race. I swear, the day after the 2016 election he was already talking about how people were "positioned" for 2020. This kind of analysis never means anything. Go back and listen to the talk about the 2016 election in 2015 for a clue.
And they don't even think about elections in a realistic way. Yesterday they were talking about how the Dems failed to sell competence last time (Hillary), so they probably shouldn't try that again. I wonder if they listen to themselves. There was a time, believe it or not, when both parties nominated people who were fairly competent. Even Ronald Reagan, who people thought was a joke, had served as governor of California before becoming president.
Anyway, assuming competence is an attribute like hair color or gender, height or whatever, the next election is exactly the time to be selling competence. Why? Because the electorate flip flops. We always elect the opposite of what we elected last time.
For example, we elected Trump to follow Obama.
- Obama is black and Trump is a racist.
- Trump throws tantrums and Obama's nickname is "No Drama."
- Trump is a complete idiot, drooling at the mouth, and Obama has a law degree, is a professor, a total technocrat who probably aced every test he took. Trump probably bought his grades with money or blackmail (probably blackmail).
Extrapolating, the next president will probably be a woman, obviously -- but bland and reliable, not too old, known for listening and studious, even pious, and not rich. And not a celebrity.
Although I don't know much about her, I would take a good look at Amy Klobuchar from Minnesota. She's intelligent, passionate, confident, speaks well, has a sense of humor, is well-educated, young but not too young, thoughtful, and has the right values to start to undo the damage done by Repubs during the reign of Trump.
Why not Kirsten Gillibrand? She has many of the same qualities as Klobuchar, but she's from New York. I come from NY too, but I don't think our president should. NY is our largest city, but it's actually a pretty small place. Trump stood out in NY, but we're seeing how that doesn't work globally. But even if it's great to have a president from NY, remember we flip-flop, and I'd say the odds of two consecutive presidents from NY is pretty slim.
Anyway, as you can see, there are some interesting things to think about for 2020, even though it's so far away. Of course they discussed none of this on MTP Daily yesterday.
PS: You want a courageous Democratic ticket? Klobuchar for president with Keith Ellison as VP. Unlike most Democrats these two can complete a sentence without sounding like an idiot. Both from Minnesota, btw, but look at how different they are. They say to white men who vote Trump, fuck you -- you had your chance, this is the way things look now. Get a pair, growth the fuck up and let's really start winning.
I have no idea what Facebook announced - 2018-01-12T13:53:38Z
They announced something.
What this all means, I have no freaking clue.
Since the Algorithm is proprietary, I don't know what it did before that was so different. I gather they're reneging on their deal with professional journalism?
I always thought friends had huge influence over what I see in the timeline.
And won't Putin still be able to buy ads to fuel the virality of his mischief?
What if two networks, say Netflix and Amazon, did a deal. They would both do 1-hour-weekly dramas, one the reboot of The West Wing, and the other a Republican version. Find a prominent Democrat-leaning celebrity to be POTUS on the Democratic show, and a prominent Republican for the other. Offer the first job to Oprah, if she doesn't want to do it, how about Barack or Michelle Obama? Joe Biden. Hillary Clinton? Lawrence O'Donnell or Rosie O'Donnell or maybe someone from CNN like Brian Stelter. And then privately tell the president that he could have the second job, permanently, no impeachment -- president for life, on TV. Everyone can be entertained by all the crazy shit Trump tweets. He can nuke anyone he wants because it'll just be on TV. I think he might go for it. His "base" would go apeshit. Let Trump be Trump! (Note: He has to resign the real presidency before he can have the TV job.)
New truce with Facebook. Every day I try to write something with no links or style so I can post it to Facebook. I also post it to Twitter via pork.io.
I'd like to have a personal social net that's coffee house size. Play a few tunes, have a couple of drinks, tell a few stories, and come back tomorrow and the night after that. There's a bouncer at the door so if you come in all nasty and shit, we kick your ass out.
I saw Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri yesterday. I really liked it. The best acting. A bunch of sad stories, told with humor. You know it has to be good cause Frances McDormand is in it. Like I, Tonya and Lady Bird, two other movies I've seen in the last few days, it's a story of a mother suffering for a daughter. All beautiful movies. The thing that makes a movie great, as always, is suspension of disbelief. If you get into the story, the movie is good. If you are still in the story the next day, it's great.
In human relations there are no absolute truths, just points of view. That's why when someone says someone else is tone deaf -- the person who's doing the saying is the one who's out of tune. Further, if you're trying to rep a cause, you'd better do a lot of listening, or you won't do much persuading. No one wants to be proven wrong, and if that's what you're selling you're not going to be heard much. This is what my grandfather said to me as a very young person, he called it the art of living. I remember the words, even if I didn't understand the idea. Now I do. It's the thing life teaches you. Listen.