You're viewing old version number 28. - Current version
Design by Writing
http://thenextweb.com/dd/2015/05/06/6-simple-tips-for-designing-copy-on-the-web/
Content
- Good Writing and Editing Is Part of Great Design
- Content is the hero
- Content as Medium
- Words
- Reminder: Design is still about words
- Subcompact Publishing
Design
- Dieter Rams: ten principles for good design
- Learning to See
- Blogs for Readers - Hacker News discussion
- This is my favorite website
- The 100% Easy-2-Read Standard from 2006
- This is a motherf*cking website
- The Honest Web Design
- Optimal Characters Per Line
- Responsive Typography - The Basics
- Web Typography
- Fonts Have Feelings Too
- The importance of emotion in design
- Reader First Internet
- Re-thinking linking
- The Value of Content
- http://www.typewolf.com/cheatsheet
- Readability
- https://www.readability.com
- http://www.pearsonified.com/typography
- http://www.studiopress.com/design/google-font-combinations.htm
http://backstage.pickcrew.com/update-blog/ - http://www.codeitpretty.com/2013/05/blog-font-style-with-css-spacing.html
- http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/08/20/typographic-design-survey-best-practices-from-the-best-blogs/
- http://typographica.org
- http://www.pearsonified.com/2011/12/golden-ratio-typography.php
- http://typecast.com/blog/a-more-modern-scale-for-web-typography
- http://jothut.com/cgi-bin/junco.pl/blogpost/339/27Jun2013/Resolved-Experiment-with-fonts-and-CSS
Recommendations
- 55 to 75 characters per line on desktop/laptop
- line height of 140 to 160 percent
- font size of at least 20 px
- letter spacing of 0 to 1 px depending upon font type
- letter-spacing: 0.01em; ??
- paragraph spacing? twice the line height? more than two times line height?
What often gets missed is proportion. On every device, our H1s are three times (3em) the size of the body, every H2 is 2.25em, and so on.
After a lot of experimentation, 35–40 characters per line on a typical smartphone seems to me to provide the best balance for more legible and readable text.
Etc.
This page works because it easily provides information that is useful for interested readers. No web-abusive aesthetic cruft is used to infuriate the reader. This single page is more superior in web design than the web sites of Twitter, Pinterest, etc. because those giant properties abuse normal web behavior that has existed for more than 20 years. We don't need websites to act like native apps.
http://www.shelaghlewins.com/tablet_weaving/TW01/TW01.htm
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6549018
Blogs are my newspapers, thats why. For me accessibility and downwards compatability outweigh the "product" a lot. I have a low-end smart phone for which most "products" are ununsable. Why do people throw away expensive hardware that woks perfectly fine? Because the modern software doesn't run on it.Take for example the opposite: http://blog.fefe.de
That is a product that meets my demands: I can read on any device, using multiple clients. I could read this page with a dual-core as well as with a gameboy. Serve TTF font's, maybe I rather use bitmap fonts? Doesn't matter.
I could read that blog using Mosaic, lynx, w3m... kindle displays... It also works fine for braille terminals.
I guess I am more interested in powerful systems than the pityful products of the App-bubble. After all I am a programmer.
From JR's : articles
423 words - 3336 chars
- 2 min read
created on
updated on
- #
source
- versions
Related articles
Design by Writing - Apr 03, 2016
Using the Links web browser - Apr 23, 2016
Snarky, tear-down content - Dec 17, 2014
The top features for community sites are users and their content - Oct 03, 2014
Interesting Tech and Writing Info - Dec 14, 2015
more >>