You're viewing old version number 6. - Current version
ContentEditable web browser editors
Not for me. I'll continue to use my "enhanced" JavaScript editor that I "created" in the summer of 2013. Around that time.
I did not create it from scratch. I downloaded someone else's open source code and modified the code to work the way I wanted. I added features.
For my Junco, Grebe, Scaup, and Veery web publishing apps, "my" JavaScript editor has been modified slightly for each web app. It now sends JSON requests to my API code instead of packaging JSON within a url-encoded POST to the API.
My modified editor has always received JSON from my API code.
Anyway, about ContentEditable:
http://scripting.com/2015/08/12/theresAContenteditableCommunity.html
http://html5demos.com/contenteditable
https://w3c.github.io/editing/contentEditable.html
https://medium.com/medium-eng/why-contenteditable-is-terrible-122d8a40e480
http://marijnhaverbeke.nl/blog/prosemirror.html
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/prosemirror#/story
Obviously, ProseMirror is well-done and sophisticated, but I'm not a fan of WYSIWYG, nor do I like live-preview.
In the video, it appears that ProseMirror requires a mouse for formatting content. I wonder if that's true. I use my enhanced JavaScript editor on my iPhone 5C to create and update posts.
Within my HTML textarea boxes and within my enhanced JavaScript editor, I type the formatting commands in Textile, Markdown/MultiMarkdown, or HTML.
Nearly all of the time, I use Textile. I've been typing in Textile since 2005.
#browser - #web - #editor - #javascript
From JR's : articles
205 words - 1546 chars
- 1 min read
created on
updated on
- #
source
- versions
Related articles
ContentEditable web browser editors - Aug 12, 2015
Forbes.com with javascript disabled - Jun 08, 2016
Using the Links web browser - Apr 23, 2016
Web browser editors - April 2016 - Apr 13, 2016
My Web Browser Lineup on My Linux Home Computer - Jun 02, 2016
more >>