You're viewing old version number 4. - Current version

2 min

Media thinks video will save its industry

"To serve advertisers, digital media companies are shifting away from text and pictures toward video, a hard move for small web properties with few resources"
(Brian Feldman/New York Magazine) - 2016-08-28T00:45:0
http://mediagazer.com/160828/p1#a160828p1

#writing #media #business #advertising #video #moronism

good luck. with advertising, old and new media orgs have relied on a seriously flawed business plan for many years. yet the failures seemingly go unnoticed by media orgs. they have to become low quality, high quantity content mills to have a fighting chance.

http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/08/the-video-revolution-in-media-is-already-here.html

It’s been a big, weird year for the media industry. Gawker, the pioneering blog, declared bankruptcy and was sold off to Univision, whose millennial-focused digital endeavor Fusion has been having trouble finding an audience.

The Awl, an heir to a certain version of Gawker, moved to Medium along with a number of other small websites. Medium’s own in-house editorial product, Matter, has turned itself into a … studio? Or something?

BuzzFeed missed its early revenue goals by a wide margin, and has reorganized internally to emphasize video. (A better outcome for employees than at Mashable, where dozens were laid off in April, in preparation for a “strategic shift” toward video.)

Vice launched a cable channel! Which no one is watching. Not that the executives at Disney, who seem likely to purchase the company, mind.

And then there’s Tronc. Tronc! Whatever it is.

What’s going on? At the root of these changes is a change in how digital publishers and advertisers do business.

Selling display ads — banner ads and other advertisements you see alongside articles on websites in your browser — is no longer really lucrative enough to support a business.

At the same time, sponsored ads — article-like pieces of content that are created at the behest, and with the input of, brands — haven’t been able to replace them.

So what’s next? Video ads. And to sell video ads, you need video.

We’re living through the effects of an ongoing shift away from text and pictures and toward video as the primary product of digital-media companies, a break that even the best-capitalized media brands are navigating only with difficulty.

Smaller publishers are calling it quits or offloading their technical infrastructure to Medium. Larger ones are cozying up to telecom giants, partnering with the hydra-headed conglomerates like Disney and NBCUniversal, or subsidizing themselves with conferences.

According to The Wall Street Journal, “The company has to host regular screenings with pizza and beer so that its largely 20-something staffers can actually see the shows they spend their days making”; millennials don’t have cable.

That doesn't apply only to millennials, which is an idiotic label. We don't have cable nor satellite TV either. We do not have a landline phone. We use Verizon for our cell phones. For internet access, we use local provider Toast.net. We watch TV, mainly by using a Roku box. I watch DvDs on the little TV in the basement while I exercise. It's the only way that the basement TV can be used. We only have two TVs. Toast.net partners with AT&T's Uverse somehow for its high-speed internet offerings.

From JR's : articles
511 words - 3289 chars - 2 min read
created on
updated on - #
source - versions

Related articles
Media thinks video will save its industry - Aug 28, 2016
Journalism and Social Media - July 2016 - Jul 12, 2016
Thu, June 30, 2016 links to read - Jun 30, 2016
WTOL fires employees for playing the game Cards Against Humanity - Jan 15, 2016
Journalists' Goal for 2017: Produce Fake News - Jan 11, 2017
more >>



A     A     A     A     A

© 2013-2017 JotHut - Online notebook

current date: May 5, 2024 - 6:49 a.m. EDT